What memory aids do you use? 1.6.19

Are sweatpants cool or geeky? 1.6.27

If the Axiom of Sevens is diametrically opposed to the general Pythagorean
concept, why then is it possible to observe a three dimensional form within the
constructs of conceptual formative geometry? 1.6.25

What is your personal trademark? 1.6.27

Which Looney Tunes character(s) do/did you identify most with?

Is there a song that makes you cry every time you hear it? 0.12.16
[ego control of multiple time/space/matter futures within prosent]

Have people become careless about punctuation? 1.7.14

 

What memory aids do you use? 1.6.19
[programming the universe, world servers]
Kristal_Rose 
mnemonics, associations, and often programming the universe, for instance I would have a neighbors
dog bark everytime the next waffle was done cooking. I also have vast files on my computer and in
a multi-tiered sub-indexed notebook full of post-it notes. I have a crate of post-its, and a box for
all the sequentially dated retired notes on any subject that ever catches my attention. I was
thinking to write WAP web pages so that all my sub-categoricall filed notes (for instance
arts:music:theory:scales:22 note) would be available on a cell phone whenever I needed saved info
of any sort.
Kristal_Rose

I wish I had a way to remember what I was just thinking. On bad days, I ask that of
myself several times per minute. I arrange all my work in intense visual organization, so
all I have to do is look at my hands to see what I'm doing and what comes next. I'm the
sort of person who forgets the entire topic they were thinking about in the time it takes
to tab from one web page to another. That's one reason I use two computer screens
on my computer.
Biggles286 replies to Kristal_Rose
Programming the universe? I don't understand how that's possible.
Kristal_Rose replies to Biggles286 1.6.27
I could spend years trying to explain it, but they wouldn't compare te experiencing it for a few seconds. There are many diluted versions out there like 'creative visuaization'. The key to doing it is to realize that absolutely everything that happens to you is under God's control; also God is the source of your own body, mind, past, and future. Just as your mouth is the puppet of your mind, your mind is the puppet of Gods mind. If you take your consciousness further back, you are no longer in the rambling unaware puppet mind, and can reside closer to where the forces that determine your entire life experience reside. The initial difficulty with doing so is that being there eradicates the notion that you an an independent sensory creature amidst other purely unique creatures. Intstead it is one. The cost of this knowledge is that you are entirely impartial to what happens to your own body more than others. In other words you can't have your cake and eat it too [Mystic experience]. I learned after three years of having this power but living in total ambivalence that it was possible to live in the play (believe yourself to be a person living amongst others experiencing chance), visit the impartial place where the script is written to make changes, and return to a state of consciousness where you can appreciate it as a miracle or gift [Occult experience]. I find there are limitations to what you may conjure, for instance you can not do anything that will not fit in the belief system of those around you. If you want to conjure intelligent auroras that will be seen by 100's of people, it has to be done with the excuse that it is a public test of new military technology. If you wish to see a cat talk, it will only happen when your guests are at a level to accept that. Fortunatly my friends in recent years are mostly on the same level, so I'm not terribly limited in what I can have happen. One of them showed me a.. well never mind. We are only as powerless on this planet as we choose to make ourself for entertainments purpose. If you could really contemplate omniscience and omnipotence you would see why God doesn't do it. It would be like playing Monopoly without rules, fun for a few minutes, but that's it. My preferred level is one in which I don't have to worry about physical existence when living humbly, and having new miracles, states of consciousness, and unique opportunities to serve about every three months. Then of course, I spend the rest of the time talking about it on SC.
Programming the universe is best understood from an eastern faith like hinduism. It can be explained through western faiths as well, but that requires either high level interpretations of the logos trinity, or a study of the kaballistic tree of life as maintained by high jewish priests. At your level, the only real explanation is that of constantly praying and having your prayers answered. It's lonely at the top. I only go there a few hours on occasions like Easter. Last Easter was a peak for me in fact. God offered me 'whatever' I wanted. I declined the offer (I presume it will be made again later) because like I said, omnipotence is almost a form of suicide tha makes everything meaningless.
Everybody is writing their script of not only how they react, but the events that happen to them. 20% of the people I know are aware of this, but probably oly a minute percentage globally. When I had my awakening I was told I was one of about 50ooo at the time (13 years ago). My last church was at this level. There are people walking around with such negativity that it causes misery in their entire sphere, yet they are asleep and presume they are reacting to a world that is naturally negative. So far I have limited myself to making changes in the world without rewriting other's consciousness (a friend explained to me that recently that I had been overwriting others, inc. her. :-() The objectives of my last church were to prevent global calamity caused by the remerging of spirit and science by subjecting everyone asleep to the divine plan of God, rather than waiting for them to work out their dharma. My request in lifes script was that the 2nd meeting I went to (after verifying the level they were on during the first) was to have them explain their agenda. Indeed, the whole meeting in an emergency decision became devoted to that. I was also spying telepathically on many members, because in fact I did go there as a form of police insurance just in case (if you had read some of their mat'l a year prior, you'd understand). It was such a delight to find a church where no one blinks an eye if your recent work is in time/matter reconfiguration, but God said just as I was all dressed up for the 3rd monthly meeting that I should not attend, that I would ruin their game. I first took that to mean the church, but am now fairly certain that refers to their agenda. Apparently God prefers people have free will, even if that means large pockets of global destruction and misery will occur.

You are programming your little universe. If you fall in love with horses, you will meet planty of horse people. If you believe that everything is random & boring and that you are powerless, you will get that experience, but that was your unconscious choice too. When you realize that you are only an extension of the mind and God, you become simultaneous with all space, matter, and time. People ask how it is possible that I read minds at times; it is because they are extensions of the same mind I share.

Are sweatpants cool or geeky? 1.6.27
{fashion}

Kristal_Rose 
Pure geeky. I carry them on my bike to pull over a skirt and keep warm if bicylcling home at night
from a party or something.

SueBee replies to Zang 
Wow, you remember what you wore in 1985? You must have one o' them pornograhic memories. 
Kristal_Rose replies to SueBee 
I remember my wardrobe that year {and yes, I do have eidetic memory}. That year was green
vertical pin stripes on black or white, black & white 501's, white leathar shoes painted mottled
clear emerald, a white paisley on white silk tie, a shimmering navy/purple alternation shirt. That
year I was painting red and white bikini's using lip and fingerprints to resist the red. I wear red
and white polka dots now.

What is your personal trademark? 1.6.27

Kristal_Rose 
I'm pretty amorphous. I'll have to think about that. In the meantime, here's my logo.

Kristal_Rose replies to juliw 
I have a soft attaché just like yours, complete with tarot, design notes, maps, 4 color pens,
harmonicas, sketch journal, recursively sub-indexed post-it note file-book, a change of clothes.
juliw replies to Kristal_Rose 
Those bags sure are handy! I should clean mine out, though, get some of the obsolete work notes,
etc.
juliw replies to Kristal_Rose 
cool logo, by the way! Did you draw that yourself?
Kristal_Rose 1.6.27
I used to have that problem. Now it's routine to throw it on the bed when I get home
(which is also my desk next to my computer) and empty the contents. I can't go to sleep
till I fluff/rattle/shake it upside down, transcribe my notes, and repack the future
essentials like make-up and maps. Before that I was carrying around projects 4 months
old. The bed is my day's agenda desk. Everything that needs done is set on it, and I can
sleep when it's cleared.
heyzeus1 replies to Kristal_Rose
hey i see you did put a symbol in your comment. interesting. mine is a sine wave with
one dot above the north and one south.
Kristal_Rose replies to heyzeus1 1.6.27
Super Excellent. I drew (cursive scribble doodling) a music flow including things like ring of eyes - eye in the pyramid - quasar spiral dive - tribal fairies, and of course played it till my fingers had blisters. Have you been noticing last nights comments speaking with font math. {and the new survey "." and the other new survey ""?} Last night it was 'I AM ON THE NET'. I did it by means of web OS updates. Blank screen with a red Q spinning in my field of Horus. I guess I was inspired by my neighbor who's TV consists solely of programming and a blue and black stripe labelling the music. Have you ever contemplated puctuation? Consider the "." to be the nexus source and think in terms of quantum leaps in consciousness; perambulating, direction, dangling, duplication, insertion, location, cartesian coordinates, higher dimension.. they all have a lot to say.

If the Axiom of Sevens is diametrically opposed to the general Pythagorean
concept, why then is it possible to observe a three dimensional form within the
constructs of conceptual formative geometry? 1.6.25
{Fermat}

smurf 
It depends ... if the 3 dimensional form is a duck, then it may be Donald, who accidentally bumped
into Daisy while she was standing on a stool, cleaning the windowsills. He's hiding in the "conceptual
formative geometry" 'cos Daisy grabbed her wooden rolling pin and started chasing Donald around
the house. He eventually found his way to the front door and opened it to find Clarabelle standing on
the step trying to ring the doorbell but the doorbell broke a week back when Donald accidentally
whacked it with his shovel. He ran past a stunned Clarabelle, who glanced up to see a raging,
red-faced Daisy running towards her like a bull on heat, with a rolling pin held above her head.
Clarabelle figured it would probably be best if she followed Donald (just in case this was a case of
menopause or something) so she ran after Donald, followed by a screaming Daisy clutching a wooden
rolling pin above her very red face. Anyway, Donald somehow outran his rather angry wife, obviously
managing to hide away from her. And if you look around carefully, you may also spot a shaken (but
not stirred) cow hiding somewhere nearby....... 
Kristal_Rose 
I was trying to find this 'Axiom of Sevens'. the following interesting links appeared, all reminiscent
of this weeks project of mine in compression algorithms:
http://www.vix.com/objectivism/writing/JoelKatz/logic.html
http://www.mmsysgrp.com/strctcat.htm or http://www.megahitmovies.com/strctcat.htm
http://www.ifss.org/Nexus.htm - "Just plain thirdness, the elemental term, “art” in ideometry, is
not necessarily regular, such as using a pattern or medium. It only means change is possible. That
could be accidental and various. A regular way must combine mind and art, and not just by way of
mind being a part of art. In the elemental sum, m + l = a, that plus one or life is elemental existence
which, as in any case of existence, has no inherent, essential relations. On the other hand, when one
way is a mapping of another, the two correspond and are related, which is mind times art. It’s like
the slang expression, “government issue” which is abbreviated “G. I.” "
http://www.nd.edu/~afreddos/courses/intro/descarte.htm - "STEP SEVEN: Proof of the
existence of material objects (including my own body) [p. 21]"
http://www.svpvril.com/astro.html
http://sacred-texts.com/the/sd/sd2-1-02.htm - "Pythagoras calls Sukra-Venus the Sol alter, "the
other Sun." Of the "seven palaces of the Sun," that of Lucifer Venus is the third one in Christian and
Jewish Kabala, the Zohar making of it the abode of Samael. According to the Occult Doctrine, this
planet is our Earth's primary, and its spiritual prototype. Hence, Sukra's car (Venus-Lucifer's) is
said to be drawn by an ogdoad of "earth-born horses," while the steeds of the chariots of the other
planets are different. "
Kristal_Rose replies to smurf
Wow, I didn't know you had it in you.
smurf replies to Kristal_Rose 
*LOL* Neither did I! *WINK*
heyzeus1 replies to smurf 
I'm impressed! You are obviously a wise master! I will have to re-think my theories now.
jkiehart 
SYSTEM
OVERLOAD
Danger, Will Robinson, Danger!
Pomeranian 
When I want to resolve such issues, I simply ask Aristotle.
heyzeus1 replies to Kristal_Rose 
i haven't stumbled across fermats last theorem yet.
Kristal_Rose replies to heyzeus1 
A^x + B^x = C^x holds true in right triangles only for x = 2. People, inc the Math head at
Princeton have dedicated thuir lives to way over complicating that proof lost 300 years ago; a proof
that was implied to be brief, within easy grasp, and not requiring volumes of 20th cent math. Simply
overlay plots of the extremes of right triangle formation in an x,y graph where x is as in the
formula above, and y is the slope C^x / (A^x + B^x). It becomes instantly apparent that there is no
room for other solutions to converge (where y=1) on other x's regardless of triangle geometry. If
you saw the proofs out there, you'd laugh. It's like trying to solve freeway offramp capacities
based on lunar gravitation. They were trying to use sequential calculus for a non-linear problem.
So btw, what is the Axiom of Sevens as you meant?
Kristal_Rose replies to Pomeranian 
Funny, That was a link that appeared in my search of 'axiom of sevens' that I decided not to
include.
Kristal_Rose replies to jkiehart 
I collect little toys. One is a key fob of that robot which randomly says "Danger, Will Robinson,
Danger!", "Warning, Warning", or "That does not compute".
Zang replies to Kristal_Rose 
Yeah! Yeah!
heyzeus1 replies to Zang 
she's got me.
heyzeus1 replies to Kristal_Rose 
i picked that one from the ether
heyzeus1 replies to Kristal_Rose 
you know something funny though, when i typed a search for axiom of sevens, my browser took me
to the most likely site : SCOTTISH RUGBY
thanks for the links though, they are very interesting. maybe they will help me to figure out what i
was talking about when i made this survey
Kristal_Rose replies to Zang 
That would be more /likely than Atlantis Wou ldn't .+/- x
Kristal_Rose replies to heyzeus1 
I am the ether.
heyzeus1 replies to Kristal_Rose 
then thank you very much for the wonderful axiom of sevens!

What is your personal trademark? 1.6.27

Kristal_Rose 
I'm pretty amorphous. I'll have to think about that. In the meantime, here's my logo.
Kristal_Rose replies to juliw 
I have a soft attaché just like yours, complete with tarot, design notes, maps, 4 color pens, harmonicas, sketch journal, recursively sub-indexed post-it note file-book, a change of clothes.
juliw replies to Kristal_Rose 
Those bags sure are handy! I should clean mine out, though, get some of the obsolete work notes, etc.
juliw replies to Kristal_Rose 
cool logo, by the way! Did you draw that yourself?
Kristal_Rose replies to juliw 
I used to have that problem. Now it's routine to throw it on the bed when I get home (which is also my desk next to my computer) and empty the contents. I can't go to sleep till I fluff/rattle/shake it upside down, transcribe my notes, and repack the future essentials like make-up and maps. Before that I was carrying around projects 4 months old. The bed is my day's agenda desk. Everything that needs done is set on it, and I can sleep when it's cleared.
heyzeus1 
its a symbol, but i cant draw it here, cause i don't know how to draw on a computer. and if i have an sc trademark, it is stubborn refusal to capitalize.
heyzeus1 replies to Kristal_Rose 
hey i see you did put a symbol in your comment. interesting. mine is a sine wave with one dot above the north and one south.
Kristal_Rose replies to heyzeus1 
Super Excellent. I drew (cursive scribble doodling) a music flow including things like ring of eyes - eye in the pyramid - quasar spiral dive - tribal fairies, and of course played it till my fingers had blisters. Have you been noticing last nights comments speaking with font math. {and the new survey "." and the other new survey ""?} Last night it was 'I AM ON THE NET'. I did it by means of web OS updates. Blank screen with a red Q spinning in my field of Horus. I guess I was inspired by my neighbor who's TV consists solely of programming and a blue and black stripe labelling the music. Have you ever contemplated puctuation? Consider the "." to be the nexus source and think in terms of quantum leaps in consciousness; perambulating, direction, dangling, duplication, insertion, location, cartesian coordinates, higher dimension.. they all have a lot to say.
Kristal_Rose replies to juliw 
yep. ever make it to my site, ereiam?
HareKrishna replies to Kristal_Rose 
What does your logo mean?
heyzeus1 replies to Kristal_Rose 
sure, but the ABSENCE of punctuation punctuates the the punctuation even more, due to the fact that it is so noticably missed. "." has a lot to say though. as does "~", almost my symbol. it means a lot. balance. constant movement. there is no perfection reached because you have to go back and learn being imperfect again at a higher level, and stuff like that. cycles, balance, cygnus, alpha and omega. 'n stuff.
Kristal_Rose replies to heyzeus1 
I was with you. The survey with no punctuation was not about punctuation. It denoted the ultimate survey by implicitly (not) being it's antithesis.
Kristal_Rose replies to HareKrishna 
Interdimensional nexus of calibrated celestial time/space/matter (spectral physics) transmutations with an organic heart based source, and a creating perception monitoring the flow of these transmutations.

Which Looney Tunes character(s) do/did you identify most with?
Kristal_Rose 1.7.6
I was just out in my yard wishing i could water my yard without waking neighbors. Just then it
rained. I was thinking to join a pow wow like the one i did last year that launched twe weeks
of storm last july. I had that happen before when I was in the forest and wanted a shower.
Brian replies to Kristal_Rose
So, among other things you are a rain maker?
Ya know, just once I like to see it really rain cats and dogs.
Preferably small cats and dogs.
Kristal_Rose replies to Brian 1.7.6
You got it. Last year I was at a party, and happened to bring along photos of some native sacred grounds and the spirits it contained (there was a mary shrine there and i got a picture of her behind her statue too, many weird things on that roll there). It just so happened my girlfriend had also invited an intertribal council chief who was on his way to an intertribal powwow the next morning (yea, someone who could understand things like the quetzalcoatl rock photo where the sky (overhead waterfall) waters meet the earth (cave spring) waters) to do a rain dance. I ended up doing a canary thunder dance standing on the back of her love seat wailing on two harmonicas at once (world history as told by lone and flocking birds to the hillbillys, celts, and pirates is one of my common songs to play) to a bird whistling accompaniest. I wasn't officially dating her in the remotest but she had said I didn't stand a chance with a woman so I got her fuming by flirting with all her close girlfriends. When everyone else left, she screamed repeatedly at the top of her lungs to me "You don't make the fucking sun come up". When I hit home at sunrise I was too alter conscioused to sleep and instead meditated with my head full of purple lightening for hours. Likewise the skies of LA were filled with such for hours leading to a freak summer storm of a couple weeks duration that took out many homes.
I also once summoned a storm and got so power lusty that I took out my moms fence (Fortunately I knew she wanted an excuse to replace it anyhow). My birth name was Thor, and yeah, I guess amongst other things, I am a rainmaker. Usually I summon heat. It rises a dozen degrees when I visit my mom, and 40 degrees when I visit Alaska (at least until I have my toboggan run built, then it drops from 12F to -60F so I can get my photo next to a temperature billboard.) The Star Wars Tesla technology reminds me so much of Dr. Seuss's Oobleck though. Next on my weathar agenda is to have lime and lavendar skies. I've heard hints that these exist (separately) already.
The world will have to reach a vastly different level before I move on to cats and dogs.

 

Is there a song that makes you cry every time you hear it? 0.12.16
[ego control of multiple time/space/matter futures within prosent
Brian replies to jkiehart 
(handing her a tissue)
I understand. One never knows what will trigger it. 
It happened to me the last time I ran outta ink in my pen.
Kristal_Rose replies to Brian
I have to do mind over matter to keep ink flowing from my pen, or keep both tracks on my
stereo going, or.. All sorts of things that normal people take for granted, I have to use
remote control meditation on. I used to think it was blessing, but now I'm not so sure. I was
visiting a neigbor last night and got a chance to demonstrate, doing things like controlling her
TV volume.
Brian replies to Kristal_Rose 
Yeah, but anybody can throw a brick through at their neighbor's tv. Was she impressed?
BYW: you are up early today. Good morning!
Kristal_Rose replies to Brian
Yeah, I think she was. I was over there to do my automatic guitar playing and mixed us some
great rainbow liquers with ouzo, melon, cherry, and triple-sec. It's good to have a neighbor
that can accept you communicating over her TV set at the same time as your jaw flaps. I've
run into some people who use the whole world as their blackboard, I might try to describe an
MGTC-3, and the'll say 'you mean like that one', just as one oncomes around the freeway
bend. I definitely live in another dimension, and as it gets weirder each year I wonder how
much further this can go on and bear any semblance to what i once called reality. Mostly it's
making sure that the universe still has 'other' people that keeps it ticking for me.
Yawn. I've been suffering chronic fatigue. Alas, it seems that being awake at day may have
been the problem. 
Brian replies to Kristal_Rose 
Didn't I see you in "Matrix"?
Kristal_Rose replies to Brian
When that came out, it became a lot easier to explain things to my students.
Brian replies to Kristal_Rose 
So, this isn't really year 2001? When are we?
Kristal_Rose replies to Brian
Within reason , Brian. It served to show what we can do; not why. In fact I considered
the movie an act of subterfuge. It demonstrates waking up into truth, then suggests
that the ultimate reality is something dismal and suggests we go back to sleep. The
thirteenth floor came out at the same time, and wasn't nearly as dimal, though of
course it explained reality as technical VR as well.
We are now, Brian. All futures and pasts exist entirely within the moment. We don't all
share the same world, just common boundaries. To say there was only one past, or
that it is written in stone is nearly absurd. The only excuse we even have for saying
that time marches forward is because most peoples memory is unidirectional. If
you've ever taken your consciousness out of mind, as one goes out of body while
your body carries on it's duties like computer programming or multi-tiered
theosophical conversation with a friend on auto-pilot, you will realize that (humbling
as that might be (like so many opportunities)) we are not even the product of our
experience, that consciousness is but a hitchhiker/observor in creation, and only the
Ego is silly enough to claim credit for it. I lost faith in scientific cause and effect a
dozen years ago (though it still exists in my parallel universe) because I could see
several other laws of cause and effect also always occurring at the same time. They
interact with my mind. If I could give you a video tape of what I witness superimposed
with my internal dialogue you'd understand. This past year or two things have
happened which don't even seem to correspond with newtonian physics anymore.
Let go of the old explanations. Start having some fun.
Brian replies to Kristal_Rose
Hmm... this time I understand what you are trying to say. 
The only point which is not plausible to me is the idea that all futures and past exist
within the moment. This is to say that all futures and all histories are predetermined.
(I`m sure you have the discussion where THE future is predetermined.) 
I don`t buy into this. Memory and time flow opposite directions. Memory can not exist
without the passage of time. And we remember the past, not the future.
Remembering "futures" is but a dream(s). Especially if it is alleged that any of those
futures might be the one we experience.
No, my friend, on this issue, we will have to agree to disagree. 
To me the future only unfolds as it occurs. And actions I choose are not
predetermined.
How dismal a life to know everything experienced is/was out of our control. 
Kristal_Rose replies to Brian 1.7.15
This is tricky stuff. You reached some opposite conclusions about what it might mean. 'Only the moment exists' means only our control (our highest we, not our ego) exists. We visit the future, and if we don't like it we do another instead. Memory and time do not even exist; they too exist simultaneously only within the moment, and hence are not bound by direction. If you are aware of this, as I and many people I know are, then you write what you will later pretend to be the future or past, even though that too is only the moment. Your conclusions about your role are all based on living in the ego, which does fortunately also have the ability to hitchhike along with the creator where the plan is being written, as well as within creation where it believes itself to be a reactionary being with some limited capacity for affecting change. Writing the future means anything from deciding that your wake up call tomorrow morning will be a flock of parrots at your window to visiting a future in which people have become programmed liquid metals and changing your mind that that will no longer be the future, that an organic future will be lived instead. Writing the past is not much different, but generally (not necessarily) has the added stipuslation that we make it mesh with memory. Once you are ready to believe that nuclear science was known by the ancients and that minerals can become evolutionary life forms, you'll find that the kaballists were describing atomic phenomenon millenia ago, and that there are three forms of life on earth, one being the 1972 discovery of volcanic rocks with DNA and proteins. Past events are kept alive by collective unconscious memory. It is the memory that exists. change the memory and you change the past. You can start with your own life by changing your own history. Forget that it was once understood as newtonian physics and you will see that it was always a direct result of karma; forget that it was even a bunch of other people, and you will find that your history was entirely a metaphorical dialogue with God. That's just changing meaning; you can change actual events too, but I'm just at the edge of that understanding so don't expect a sagent debate. I have two fundamental beliefs: that we are the eyes of the creator (and our thoughts are the thoughts of the creator), and that the creator is not bound by any laws of time space matter physics: in a blink of an eye God could choose all the galaxies to become a phridzillion mile long space snake, or a quasar meson. Some of these decisions are in reach of the ego, some are not. Knowing there is nothing but God here, that all else.. ego, matter, time.. is by contrast an illusion in the mind of God, and yet our personal consciousness pervades is in my eyes omniscience and omnipotence. Creation means taking time to let that unfold.

Have people become careless about punctuation? 1.7.14
dab 
This isn't specifically Internet related but I really don't like the trend to leave out the last
comma in a list of things. English is ambiguous enough without adding mode. The sentence "I
dedicate this book to my parents, Ayn Rand and God" is very different from "I dedicate this
book to my parents, Ayn Rand, and God".
Kristal_Rose 
I haven't noticed one way or another. I myself have become casual and given to more poetic
license. I think in run on sentences so it seems natural to speak in run on sentences to
acurately convey what's on my mind. I have always considered punctuation severely limiting.
One can have two levels of nested sentence granulation by separating with semicolons and
commas, but more than that requires nested parantheses. I wish language was drawn like
diagrammed sentences with fractally branching trees, otherwise one is forced to rearrange
their thoughts into some sequence though none is meant (excepting related material thrown in
as prepratory conditioning for other subjects), other than the structural relationships.
Kristal_Rose replies to dab 1.7.14
I didn't realize the 'Oxford' {or 'serial'} comma was falling into misuse. What a tragedy,
because I agree, the distinctions are vast. To discriminate such distinctions I make use not
only of commas & semicolons, but also nested brackets, and 'and' & '&'.
*whistling* 'put your & in the & of the man who stilled the water'. 'don't worry, (*more
whistling*) be happy'.